In much the same way that you don't know what you're going to get in the NFL draft, we didn't know what we had when Art Larrance co-founded Portland Brewing in 1986. Nearly three decades later, his place in Oregon brewing history is more or less assured. He turns 70 today. Yet he carries on with gusto.
Larrance's was a player even before the advent of Portland Brewing via the Brewpub Bill. The bill, officially SB 813, was passed in 1985 and brought the emerging craft movement out of the shadows. Brewpubs were crucial because they provided a great place for early craft breweries to display their wares.
All of the founding brewers pushed for the Brewpub legislation, but it was Larrance (as legend has it) who introduced the idea to Rep. Tom Mason in the shower at Multnomah Athletic Club. Mason, a Portland Democrat, introduced the bill in the Oregon House and helped get it passed.
Then came the Oregon Brewers Festival. Larrance got involved when Portland Brewing was asked to provide beer for a blues festival in Waterfront Park in 1987. The success of that outing led to the inaugural OBF in 1988, supported by all of the four founding craft breweries. A few years later, Larrance assumed full control of the event.
The story might well have ended there had fate not intervened. Needing to expand their operation, Portland Brewing raised capital through the sale of common stock. As a result of those sales, they lost control of the business. This happened around the time they moved to the Northwest industrial area in 1993. Larrance was soon shown the door.
Never underestimate the power of, "I'll show you." Larrance soon incorporated as Cascade Brewing. He opened the Raccoon Lodge in 1998, one of the first breweries on Portland's underserved westside. While the Raccoon Lodge provided an option for craft beer fans "over there," it was slow to attract beer fans from the east side of the river. An Eastside location was needed.
After a long search, Larrance found the space on Southeast Belmont that today houses the Cascade Brewing Barrel House. The Barrel House, which opened in 2010, features blended sour beers pioneered by Larrance and collaborators Ron Gansberg and Preston Weesner as an alternative to the "hops arms race." The beers have been wildly successful.
As Larrance celebrates seven decades, the Tart Fruit Fest is happening at the Barrel House this week. It's just a coincidence, I'm told. The event runs through Sunday and features some of the beers Cascade has become famous for: Figaro, Blueberry, Bourbonic Plague, Kriek, Strawberry and more. Non-sour fans will have options, too, including Portland Ale and Cascade IPA.
With all he has going on, you might expect Larrance to relax and take it somewhat easy. Hardly. At a birthday gathering the other day, he told me he's letting some of his collectible beer memorabilia go at long last. His collection of labels, signs and related materials dating back more than 100 years is substantial. But he has other things on his mind these days.
Most prominently, he is building on the success of the sour movement with an expanded production facility off Highway 217. The climate-controlled space will quadruple the available room for blending and aging, from 5,000 to over 22,000 square feet. There will be no pub at the production facility. However, the Barrel House will eventually be renovated and expanded into a much larger pub.
Happy 70th, Art! Keep the new chapters coming.
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Saturday, February 22, 2014
Brewvana Sharpens Game for 2014 and Beyond
Coming up on three years since she launched Brewvana Brewery Tours, Ashley Rose Salvitti is finally feeling like she has her "poops in a group." That's another way of saying she's feeling really good about where her organization is headed for 2014. If you aren't aware, Brewvana provides unique tours of Oregon's beer landscape.
"Getting our act together has given me the time to learn more about travel and tourism here, and the huge business potential," Ashley said. "There really isn't another city like Portland with so many small brewers. We're unique."
Ashley, who fled North Carolina seeking a better beer life in Oregon, launched Brewvana in April 2011. She was working at Hopworks at the time. She ran all the tours and did the marketing and admin work from her tiny apartment. Those were the days...may they never return.
Arguably the most important thing anyone needs to know about Brewvana is that its leader has seemingly boundless energy. Ashley can talk about anything beer-related for hours. Along the way, she'll tell you about stuff she really enjoys: "I like to sip a good beer really fast." Sipping is clearly overrated.
Brewvana's first employee came onboard in late 2011. They moved into an actual office in 2012 and Ashley left Hopworks to focus on her own business full time. Big steps. The ability to separate work from home was a big deal. After a slow start in 2013, things eventually righted themselves. Business nearly doubled over 2012.
"Having a physical space and a set of business procedures really helped get the business moving last year,"Ashley said. "And that allowed me to invest some time in researching marketing angles. I spent time with Travel Oregon and Travel Portland. It's been informative and fun."
Perhaps the biggest thing to come out of those relationships is that Ashley heads to New York with Travel Portland in March. She's part of a group of beer and other folks going to the Big Apple to mingle with media people. The goal is to share the Portland experience...the beer part of it in Ashley's case.
"This trip came out of the blue and it's going to be amazing," Ashley said. "I've had to pinch myself a few times to make sure it isn't a dream."
There's plenty more brewing at Brewvana. The most visible change is the new-look buses. Angel and Rosie have been wrapped with high resolution graphics that tell the Brewvana story visually. The wraps were financed largely through an Indiegogo fundraiser and partly by sponsor dollars. The message is clear: "This could be you having a great time on the Brewvana bus."
"Nothing against the original graphics, but we really needed to convey a stronger sense of what it feels like to be on a tour," said Ashley. "That's the concept behind the pictures of people having fun with great beer in a great beer environment. It's a contagious message and the response has been totally positive."
One of the things they expect to do more of in 2014 is custom tours. Regularly scheduled tours will still be part of the game, but custom tours for larger groups are the better revenue model. That will be the main focus. As an example, there's a potential weeklong tour of Oregon breweries for a group of 30 in September. That would be a huge step in the direction Ashley wants to go if it happens.
"Doing larger tours is all about relationships," she said. "We've worked hard to establish relationships with the breweries, and we're now focused on building similar relationships with organizations that will help bring group tours. It's not something you can do overnight, but we've made good progress in the last year or so."
In case you're wondering, Brewvana is not directly supported by the beer industry. They typically get discounted prices on beer, which would be available to any tour group. Sponsor dollars come from six breweries: Laurelwood, Widmer, Ninkasi, Coalition, Base Camp and Hopworks. That's it. They work with breweries to provide a great experience for tour patrons, but there is no linkage.
What is the future of Brewvana beyond 2014? It's hard to say. It could wind up being a concept that gets licensed to other Oregon cities. Not exactly as a franchise, but something like that. The one thing we know for sure is that more and more people are coming to Oregon to experience the beer scene. That means opportunity for Brewvana.
The thing is, these kids really do know how to run a great tour. I've been on two of them and both were terrific experiences. If you haven't been, I recommend it. Given what they do and how they do it, the sky may well be the limit for Ms. Salvitti and Brewvana.
They do seem to have their "poops in a group."
Photos kindly provided by ASF Shoots where noted
"Getting our act together has given me the time to learn more about travel and tourism here, and the huge business potential," Ashley said. "There really isn't another city like Portland with so many small brewers. We're unique."
Ashley, who fled North Carolina seeking a better beer life in Oregon, launched Brewvana in April 2011. She was working at Hopworks at the time. She ran all the tours and did the marketing and admin work from her tiny apartment. Those were the days...may they never return.
Arguably the most important thing anyone needs to know about Brewvana is that its leader has seemingly boundless energy. Ashley can talk about anything beer-related for hours. Along the way, she'll tell you about stuff she really enjoys: "I like to sip a good beer really fast." Sipping is clearly overrated.
Brewvana's first employee came onboard in late 2011. They moved into an actual office in 2012 and Ashley left Hopworks to focus on her own business full time. Big steps. The ability to separate work from home was a big deal. After a slow start in 2013, things eventually righted themselves. Business nearly doubled over 2012.
"Having a physical space and a set of business procedures really helped get the business moving last year,"Ashley said. "And that allowed me to invest some time in researching marketing angles. I spent time with Travel Oregon and Travel Portland. It's been informative and fun."
![]() |
Getting wrapped up |
"This trip came out of the blue and it's going to be amazing," Ashley said. "I've had to pinch myself a few times to make sure it isn't a dream."
There's plenty more brewing at Brewvana. The most visible change is the new-look buses. Angel and Rosie have been wrapped with high resolution graphics that tell the Brewvana story visually. The wraps were financed largely through an Indiegogo fundraiser and partly by sponsor dollars. The message is clear: "This could be you having a great time on the Brewvana bus."
"Nothing against the original graphics, but we really needed to convey a stronger sense of what it feels like to be on a tour," said Ashley. "That's the concept behind the pictures of people having fun with great beer in a great beer environment. It's a contagious message and the response has been totally positive."
![]() |
Fearless Brewvana leader at APEX in 2012 |
"Doing larger tours is all about relationships," she said. "We've worked hard to establish relationships with the breweries, and we're now focused on building similar relationships with organizations that will help bring group tours. It's not something you can do overnight, but we've made good progress in the last year or so."
In case you're wondering, Brewvana is not directly supported by the beer industry. They typically get discounted prices on beer, which would be available to any tour group. Sponsor dollars come from six breweries: Laurelwood, Widmer, Ninkasi, Coalition, Base Camp and Hopworks. That's it. They work with breweries to provide a great experience for tour patrons, but there is no linkage.
![]() |
On tour February 2013 |
The thing is, these kids really do know how to run a great tour. I've been on two of them and both were terrific experiences. If you haven't been, I recommend it. Given what they do and how they do it, the sky may well be the limit for Ms. Salvitti and Brewvana.
They do seem to have their "poops in a group."
![]() |
Brewvana good times! |
Photos kindly provided by ASF Shoots where noted
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Never Mind The Bollocks: It's Craft Beer!
There is a certain snobby aura that has shrouded craft beer in recent times. It was not much in evidence in the early days. I believe it descended around the time beer turned into a cultural phenomenon, as opposed to something people simply consumed for enjoyment or as part of some activity. The exact timing is, as they say, a little sketchy.
It's true, you know. Once upon a time people mostly drank beer just for fun. There's still some of that today, but beer has moved on to the point where it is now a self-fulfilling, self-contained activity. People drink beer to drink beer. And an entire industry has grown up around that basic ideal.
Where it gets a little messy (and snobby) is in the blind assumptions a lot of us tend to make about craft beer. We may well have reached the point where we take beer too seriously. Could it be possible?
For anyone looking for consider the possibility that we've gone too far, a good place to start is the recent book: The Unbearable Nonsense of Craft Beer: A Rant in Nine Acts. Fair warning: You may not want to read this book if you think craft beer is a panacea. It beats up many common notions.
Unbearable Nonsense is the mind-meld of Max Bahnson (author of the blog, Pivni Filosef-Beer Philosopher) and Alan McLeod (author of A Good Beer Blog). The book appeared in digital form about a month ago and was subsequently released in paperback. You can find it on Amazon and (I assume) other online outlets. I doubt you'll find it at Powell's or at the library. Maybe someday.
This book is exactly what it says it is: a rant. The authors wind their way through a series of sometimes wacky settings (time and space are manipulated with impunity) while taking shots at many of the assumptions craft beer fans hold near and dear to their hearts. I'll get to some of those shots momentarily.
First, the bad news. These gents evidently did not feel the need to proof or edit what they wrote...or have someone do a cursory copy edit. This book, and I'm referring to the digital version because that's the one I read, needed an editor. Badly. It is riddled with typos and related errors. That's unfortunate. The book should not have been released like this. Oh well.
A few juicy tidbits from the book follow...remember, these guys hammer away at some of the most closely-held assumptions in craft beer. Nothing is sacred.
On style...Some time after [Michael] Jackson came out with the concept of styles as we understand them today, the creature started to grow uncontrollably. An [sic] dumb beast fed by many different hands but mastered by none.
On beer tasting...You haven't truly appreciated a beer until someone tells you how beer is made, what's the right temperature to drink it and the right sort of glass to drink it. If you believe that, you have been living a lie. Arseholes! They are just profiteering on the assumed ignorance and lack of confidence of the average person.
On specialty beers...People believe that big, loud beers are technically more difficult to make. And I'm not speaking about people with no technical knowledge. I have argued about it with advanced homebrewers. The commercial brewer, as natural, is happy to keep that illusion going.
On pricing...What the discourse is telling us is that those extreme, experimental, weird, gimmicky beers are riskier, require more skill to make, which justifies the higher prices you will likely have to pay for them.
On historic brewing...There is an almost retarded romanticization of pre-industrial beermaking. That not only is brainless but also loaded with hypocrisy...We've somehow been led to believe that industrial is bad. That beers in the past were purer, more honest, made with love and care. When the truth is...that more often than not, they were rubbish.
On profit...We must be more responsible as consumers, more cynical towards [sic] the people who want our money. The more we see though their bollocks and call them out for over pricing, over complicating and over branding, the more seriously they will have to take us and treat us with respect.
On blogging and social media...And it didn't occur to you for a split of an effing second that [breweries] might be saying all that bollocks so you would identify with their brand, provide free labour and spread your mindless word of mouth through social media buzz? Could it be that hop bombs impair people's capacity for rational and healthy cynical thinking?
On beer...there are still way too many people taking beer too seriously. It's as if some of them have forgotten that drinking beer is supposed to be fun and not a matter of study and careful preparation - and one upsmanship.
On glassware...You know what the best glass for drinking a beer, any beer, is? The cleanest one you have nearby.
Max and Alan could have gone a better job of making their story palatable. It's quite funny in places, but the authors sometimes get bogged down in details that are peripheral to their narrative. A good editor likely would have cut this thing down and tightened it up. Of course, there was no editor. A shame.
Regardless of those issues, this is a book beer fans should read. It pulls no punches. Hardcore craft beer fans will probably be offended by a lot of what's here. Maybe that's a good thing. No, it's definitely a good thing. There's a gigantic bubble of snobby foam around craft beer that needs to be poked.
It's true, you know. Once upon a time people mostly drank beer just for fun. There's still some of that today, but beer has moved on to the point where it is now a self-fulfilling, self-contained activity. People drink beer to drink beer. And an entire industry has grown up around that basic ideal.
Where it gets a little messy (and snobby) is in the blind assumptions a lot of us tend to make about craft beer. We may well have reached the point where we take beer too seriously. Could it be possible?
For anyone looking for consider the possibility that we've gone too far, a good place to start is the recent book: The Unbearable Nonsense of Craft Beer: A Rant in Nine Acts. Fair warning: You may not want to read this book if you think craft beer is a panacea. It beats up many common notions.
Unbearable Nonsense is the mind-meld of Max Bahnson (author of the blog, Pivni Filosef-Beer Philosopher) and Alan McLeod (author of A Good Beer Blog). The book appeared in digital form about a month ago and was subsequently released in paperback. You can find it on Amazon and (I assume) other online outlets. I doubt you'll find it at Powell's or at the library. Maybe someday.
This book is exactly what it says it is: a rant. The authors wind their way through a series of sometimes wacky settings (time and space are manipulated with impunity) while taking shots at many of the assumptions craft beer fans hold near and dear to their hearts. I'll get to some of those shots momentarily.
First, the bad news. These gents evidently did not feel the need to proof or edit what they wrote...or have someone do a cursory copy edit. This book, and I'm referring to the digital version because that's the one I read, needed an editor. Badly. It is riddled with typos and related errors. That's unfortunate. The book should not have been released like this. Oh well.
A few juicy tidbits from the book follow...remember, these guys hammer away at some of the most closely-held assumptions in craft beer. Nothing is sacred.
On style...Some time after [Michael] Jackson came out with the concept of styles as we understand them today, the creature started to grow uncontrollably. An [sic] dumb beast fed by many different hands but mastered by none.
On beer tasting...You haven't truly appreciated a beer until someone tells you how beer is made, what's the right temperature to drink it and the right sort of glass to drink it. If you believe that, you have been living a lie. Arseholes! They are just profiteering on the assumed ignorance and lack of confidence of the average person.
On specialty beers...People believe that big, loud beers are technically more difficult to make. And I'm not speaking about people with no technical knowledge. I have argued about it with advanced homebrewers. The commercial brewer, as natural, is happy to keep that illusion going.
On pricing...What the discourse is telling us is that those extreme, experimental, weird, gimmicky beers are riskier, require more skill to make, which justifies the higher prices you will likely have to pay for them.
On historic brewing...There is an almost retarded romanticization of pre-industrial beermaking. That not only is brainless but also loaded with hypocrisy...We've somehow been led to believe that industrial is bad. That beers in the past were purer, more honest, made with love and care. When the truth is...that more often than not, they were rubbish.
On profit...We must be more responsible as consumers, more cynical towards [sic] the people who want our money. The more we see though their bollocks and call them out for over pricing, over complicating and over branding, the more seriously they will have to take us and treat us with respect.
On blogging and social media...And it didn't occur to you for a split of an effing second that [breweries] might be saying all that bollocks so you would identify with their brand, provide free labour and spread your mindless word of mouth through social media buzz? Could it be that hop bombs impair people's capacity for rational and healthy cynical thinking?
On beer...there are still way too many people taking beer too seriously. It's as if some of them have forgotten that drinking beer is supposed to be fun and not a matter of study and careful preparation - and one upsmanship.
On glassware...You know what the best glass for drinking a beer, any beer, is? The cleanest one you have nearby.
Max and Alan could have gone a better job of making their story palatable. It's quite funny in places, but the authors sometimes get bogged down in details that are peripheral to their narrative. A good editor likely would have cut this thing down and tightened it up. Of course, there was no editor. A shame.
Regardless of those issues, this is a book beer fans should read. It pulls no punches. Hardcore craft beer fans will probably be offended by a lot of what's here. Maybe that's a good thing. No, it's definitely a good thing. There's a gigantic bubble of snobby foam around craft beer that needs to be poked.
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Zwickelmania: More than just Yeasty Beer
When Zwickelmania was launched a few years ago, it was mainly a means of exposing beer fans to breweries. Pretty simple. Now that the event has grown up, it has morphed into much more. The smart kids on the brewing block now see it as a launching pad for special events and beer releases.
The thing is, more than a few brewers had recently become less than enthusiastic about Zwickelmania. Why? Because it can tend to attract vagabonds seeking free beer and other bennies. That gets old. However, if you re-frame the event as an opportunity to market other things, it recaptures its shine.
So when breweries around the state roll out the red carpet to welcome beer fans this Saturday, crowds will in many cases be exposed to more than just tastes of (mostly) unfinished, yeasty beer.
You may be familiar with the Festival of Dark Arts hosted by Fort George in Astoria. It's a great example of building on the buzz of Zwickelmania. They put on a serious winter party with a terrific tap list, food and live music. All you need to do is make the trip out to Astoria and you're going to have a great time. Details here.
Then there's Breakside. Coming off 100 beers in 2013, these folks are releasing a new seasonal, Suburban Farmhouse, and a limited edition seasonal, Elder Statesman, to coincide with Zwickelmadness. Suburban Farmhouse, which will be draft only, is a takeoff on The Commons' Urban Farmhouse, but the two beers have little in common. Elder Statesman is a blend of two barrel-aged beers that were aged some more and then re-dry hopped. Bottles of Elder Statesmen will be available at Breakside's Milwaukie taproom Saturday.
In Eugene, Oakshire is thinking along similar lines with their Hellshire Day and Barrel-aged Beer Fest on Saturday. They are, of course, open for Zwicklemania tours (and yeasty beers) at their brewery. But the main event is the festival and release of Hellshire IV, available in wax dipped 22 oz bottles at their Public House.
The fourth gen Hellshire is a blend of three beers, all matured in bourbon and brandy barrels. Very Ill Tempered Gnome is the base beer. A few beer media geeks tasted Hellshire IV at Saraveza the other day. The consensus was fantastic. They plan to sell this stuff beginning at 11 a.m. and there will be a limit for the first few hours. Get some if you can!
The Hellshire Day festival features a long list of barrel-aged beers from all over the place. Your $15 entry fee includes a commemorative Teku tasting glass and five tokens. You can buy more, of course. They will also have pizza and burgers. Four bands will provide live music. A good time will surely be had by all. I know some who are saving their livers specifically for his event. More details here.
These are just a few examples of what breweries are doing for Zwickelmania 2014. It has clearly morphed into something that goes far beyond yeasty, unfinished beer. That has to be a good thing.

So when breweries around the state roll out the red carpet to welcome beer fans this Saturday, crowds will in many cases be exposed to more than just tastes of (mostly) unfinished, yeasty beer.
You may be familiar with the Festival of Dark Arts hosted by Fort George in Astoria. It's a great example of building on the buzz of Zwickelmania. They put on a serious winter party with a terrific tap list, food and live music. All you need to do is make the trip out to Astoria and you're going to have a great time. Details here.
![]() |
Look vaguely familiar? |
In Eugene, Oakshire is thinking along similar lines with their Hellshire Day and Barrel-aged Beer Fest on Saturday. They are, of course, open for Zwicklemania tours (and yeasty beers) at their brewery. But the main event is the festival and release of Hellshire IV, available in wax dipped 22 oz bottles at their Public House.
![]() |
Hellshire Day taplist |
The Hellshire Day festival features a long list of barrel-aged beers from all over the place. Your $15 entry fee includes a commemorative Teku tasting glass and five tokens. You can buy more, of course. They will also have pizza and burgers. Four bands will provide live music. A good time will surely be had by all. I know some who are saving their livers specifically for his event. More details here.
These are just a few examples of what breweries are doing for Zwickelmania 2014. It has clearly morphed into something that goes far beyond yeasty, unfinished beer. That has to be a good thing.
Monday, February 10, 2014
The Pfriem of Hood River's Brewery Crop
Hood River is a great beer destination, loaded with several prime stops. I make occasional trips out to there as part of the contract work I do. These trips don't happen often enough. When they do, I make it a point to visit a place I haven't been to. So many choices out there.
My most recent trip took me to Pfriem Family Brewing, located very near the Columbia River to the North of I-84. There's a large park across the street from the brewery and pub. This place must be absolutely nuts in the summer, but it was freezing outside and there wasn't much happening on this day.
Pfriem has been around since in early 2012, so they are coming up on two years of operation. The beers have been showing up in Portland for a while. There was a tap takeover at Velo Cult a month or so ago. Despite a fantastic turnout, there were some beers left. Great stuff, I thought.
Josh Pfriem is the brewmaster. He has a lengthy brewing background that includes stints at Full Sail and others. His approach to brewing leans heavily on an interest in Belgian and Northwest hoppy styles. It's an unusual combination, although there is a bit of a trend in that direction. There's a lot more about Josh and his brewing notions in Ezra's 2012 interview here.
The pub setting is impressive...charming industrial, I might call it. It isn't industrial in a grubby way. It reminds me of The Commons in Portland, except that Pfriem is a full pub where The Commons is strictly a tasting room. Here, you sit within feet of the tanks and there's no barrier of any kind. Unusual. All you need to now is that Pfriem's space is spotless and inviting.
They were pouring 12 beers when I stopped by, a pretty standard number for just about any pub or tasting room these days. This represents a significant escalation from what you would have typically found a few years ago. I think there are reasons for that, which I'll get to in a future post.
I ordered a taster tray that included six beers. These are four ounce pours. Since this was lunch and I was driving back to Portland afterward, a single flight was the limit. The chosen beers (shown in above photo) were Wit, Pilsner, Rye PA, CDA, Belgian Strong Dark and IPA.
These are all nice beers. The Wit (5.1% ABV, 18 IBU) is pleasantly crisp and refreshing. The Pilsner (4.9% ABV, 38 IBU) is a Northwest interpretation of the style. It's light, but fairly bold and spicy. The Rye PA (6.4% ABV, 47 IBU) is understated for a rye beer. Good, but very little zip.
The standouts for me were the IPA (7.2% ABV, 65 IBU) and the CDA (7.5% ABV, 70 IBU). The IPA has a boisterous piney aroma and a blast of grapefruit and citrus in the flavor. The CDA has complex undertones in the backbone that blend perfectly with aromas and flavors of pine and toffee. Excellent beers.
Little did I know the Belgian Strong Dark (7.5% ABV, 30 IBU) was about to be named Beer of the Year by Willamette Week. It's a nice beer and all, but it didn't suit my fancy on this day and wasn't close to my favorite beer on the tray. That's no knock on Pfriem or WW. The fact is, flavors and palates can be influenced by a wide range of factors.
As mentioned, this is a pub with a typical pub menu. It's a fairly stripped down selection of snacks, salads, sandwiches, burgers, etc. I ordered a bowl of the soup of the day, clam chowder, along with some fresh cut fries. My food arrived almost instantly, despite what appears to be a small kitchen and limited staff on duty. They are attentive.
If you're headed out to Hood River, a stop at Pfriem is definitely in order. The beer is excellent and it's a terrific spot. There's nothing particularly distinguished about the prices or the menu, but that's in keeping with the general theme of things in Hood River, which seems to be increasingly inhabited by tourists. It's tough to keep a place like this secret.
My most recent trip took me to Pfriem Family Brewing, located very near the Columbia River to the North of I-84. There's a large park across the street from the brewery and pub. This place must be absolutely nuts in the summer, but it was freezing outside and there wasn't much happening on this day.
Pfriem has been around since in early 2012, so they are coming up on two years of operation. The beers have been showing up in Portland for a while. There was a tap takeover at Velo Cult a month or so ago. Despite a fantastic turnout, there were some beers left. Great stuff, I thought.
Josh Pfriem is the brewmaster. He has a lengthy brewing background that includes stints at Full Sail and others. His approach to brewing leans heavily on an interest in Belgian and Northwest hoppy styles. It's an unusual combination, although there is a bit of a trend in that direction. There's a lot more about Josh and his brewing notions in Ezra's 2012 interview here.
The pub setting is impressive...charming industrial, I might call it. It isn't industrial in a grubby way. It reminds me of The Commons in Portland, except that Pfriem is a full pub where The Commons is strictly a tasting room. Here, you sit within feet of the tanks and there's no barrier of any kind. Unusual. All you need to now is that Pfriem's space is spotless and inviting.
They were pouring 12 beers when I stopped by, a pretty standard number for just about any pub or tasting room these days. This represents a significant escalation from what you would have typically found a few years ago. I think there are reasons for that, which I'll get to in a future post.
I ordered a taster tray that included six beers. These are four ounce pours. Since this was lunch and I was driving back to Portland afterward, a single flight was the limit. The chosen beers (shown in above photo) were Wit, Pilsner, Rye PA, CDA, Belgian Strong Dark and IPA.
These are all nice beers. The Wit (5.1% ABV, 18 IBU) is pleasantly crisp and refreshing. The Pilsner (4.9% ABV, 38 IBU) is a Northwest interpretation of the style. It's light, but fairly bold and spicy. The Rye PA (6.4% ABV, 47 IBU) is understated for a rye beer. Good, but very little zip.
The standouts for me were the IPA (7.2% ABV, 65 IBU) and the CDA (7.5% ABV, 70 IBU). The IPA has a boisterous piney aroma and a blast of grapefruit and citrus in the flavor. The CDA has complex undertones in the backbone that blend perfectly with aromas and flavors of pine and toffee. Excellent beers.
Little did I know the Belgian Strong Dark (7.5% ABV, 30 IBU) was about to be named Beer of the Year by Willamette Week. It's a nice beer and all, but it didn't suit my fancy on this day and wasn't close to my favorite beer on the tray. That's no knock on Pfriem or WW. The fact is, flavors and palates can be influenced by a wide range of factors.
As mentioned, this is a pub with a typical pub menu. It's a fairly stripped down selection of snacks, salads, sandwiches, burgers, etc. I ordered a bowl of the soup of the day, clam chowder, along with some fresh cut fries. My food arrived almost instantly, despite what appears to be a small kitchen and limited staff on duty. They are attentive.
If you're headed out to Hood River, a stop at Pfriem is definitely in order. The beer is excellent and it's a terrific spot. There's nothing particularly distinguished about the prices or the menu, but that's in keeping with the general theme of things in Hood River, which seems to be increasingly inhabited by tourists. It's tough to keep a place like this secret.
Labels:
Hood River beer,
Pfriem Family Brewing
Friday, February 7, 2014
Widmer's Upheaval IPA Hits Store Shelves Monday
One of the things I learned as a child was to never judge a book by its cover. My dad taught me. The way something looks on the outside has really no connection to what it is on the inside. This rationale applies to a lot things...including beer.
Samples of Widmer's newest IPA, Upheaval, arrived on my doorstep the other day. You did not need to know there was beer in the package to know there was beer in the package. Why? Because the box was full of loose hop cones that gave off a succulent aroma. It's an aroma that reminds me of summer. And great beer. Packaging like that can sway your thinking if you let it. I tried to block it out.
I've never been a fan of beer reviews here. Sure, I'll provide of list of beers I liked from some festival. Strictly my opinion, strictly for use as guidance. I understand beer opinions are all over the place. What I like may fall flat on your pallet. And vice versa. No need to write reviews, then.
Nonetheless, Upheaval is a beer you need to know about...and should try if you like bold, flavorful IPAs. I always ask myself when I drink any beer if I would order it again. In the case of Upheaval, my answer is a definite yes. The beer hits the mark across a pretty wide band of what I like in an IPA.
They're using a combination of 2-Row Pale, Wheat and Caramel malts. The stats say 40 percent wheat malt. Since the beer is unfiltered, the result is a brilliant copper color that is slightly hazy. ABV is 7%, about the norm for a standard IPA. Highly drinkable.
Hops are crucial in this beer, obviously. Brewers use more than two pounds of hops per barrel of Upheaval...more than any other Widmer beer. They use Alchemy for bittering; Chinook, Simcoe, Brewer's Gold, Willamette and Nelson Sauvin for aroma and flavor. They rate this beer at 85 IBU and it is fairly but not overly bitter. Aroma is not off the hook. Where you really get a blast of late addition hops is in the flavor. It's terrific.
Upheaval hasn't yet hit the market in bottled form...it's been available on draft for a few months. They're saying bottles will hit store shelves on Monday, Feb. 10. I'm looking forward to getting some more of this stuff. Widmer is kicking the year off nicely.
Samples of Widmer's newest IPA, Upheaval, arrived on my doorstep the other day. You did not need to know there was beer in the package to know there was beer in the package. Why? Because the box was full of loose hop cones that gave off a succulent aroma. It's an aroma that reminds me of summer. And great beer. Packaging like that can sway your thinking if you let it. I tried to block it out.
I've never been a fan of beer reviews here. Sure, I'll provide of list of beers I liked from some festival. Strictly my opinion, strictly for use as guidance. I understand beer opinions are all over the place. What I like may fall flat on your pallet. And vice versa. No need to write reviews, then.
Nonetheless, Upheaval is a beer you need to know about...and should try if you like bold, flavorful IPAs. I always ask myself when I drink any beer if I would order it again. In the case of Upheaval, my answer is a definite yes. The beer hits the mark across a pretty wide band of what I like in an IPA.
They're using a combination of 2-Row Pale, Wheat and Caramel malts. The stats say 40 percent wheat malt. Since the beer is unfiltered, the result is a brilliant copper color that is slightly hazy. ABV is 7%, about the norm for a standard IPA. Highly drinkable.
Upheaval hasn't yet hit the market in bottled form...it's been available on draft for a few months. They're saying bottles will hit store shelves on Monday, Feb. 10. I'm looking forward to getting some more of this stuff. Widmer is kicking the year off nicely.
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
Who Killed Dean's Scene?
Many who stop by here surely know of Dean's Scene. If you aren't in the know, Dean's Scene is located in the basement of a home on Northeast Fremont Street across from the Alameda Brewpub, where it operated as a speakeasy for a number of years. Owner Dean Pottle closed the joint this week after the OLCC notified him of probable violations.
The story announcing the closure of Dean's funhouse first appeared on the Willamette Week website. There's a reason. Several months ago, WW ran a story that delved into the goings on at Dean's Scene. It was a decidedly positive story written by Martin Cizmar, arts and culture editor at WW.
At the time, many beer geeks thought the story a bad idea...thinking it drew attention to a well-kept secret that needed to stay that way. With the announcement that Dean has shut things down, those folks are piling the blame on Cizmar and WW. This is what declining attention spans do for us.
There are several points that need clarification and, apparently, explanation. Because there are details in this mess of a story that are being horrendously overlooked.
For the record, I have no loyalty to Cizmar or WW. We run in some of the same circles, but I've never met Cizmar. I exchanged emails with WW editor, Mark Zusman, Cizmar and others as part of last year's book project. That's it. In fact, I have criticized some of Cizmar's work at WW and it stuck in his craw. Even though I often disagree with his opinions, I think he's a good writer who produces entertaining stuff. But I have zero loyalty to him or WW.
Who's responsible for the closure of Dean's Scene? Definitely not Willamette Week. The original story was a great example of providing information of interest to the community. See, that's what journalists are supposed to do. Newspapers and news weeklies pay their bills by building readership that helps sell ads and subscriptions. Cizmar's story on Dean's Scene was a dialed-in fit for those objectives.
There's more. It was not Cizmar's job to investigate the legality of the operation at Dean's Scene. Or, more to the point, to evaluate the impact of the publicity. His job was to write a story that reported on what the place had to offer, good or bad. It certainly was not his job to keep Dean's Scene secret or write a negative story so the beer geek community could keep the place all to itself.
If you want to place blame, look no further than the owner of the establishment, Pottle. He agreed to be interviewed for the WW story. If he was remotely concerned that publicity might attract the interest and ire of the OLCC, he should have declined to be interviewed. Cizmar may have still written the story, but it would have been less detailed.
Another thing to consider is this: Dean's Scene is not closed permanently. In response to the OLCC notices, Pottle filed an application for a home brewers and private club license in mid-January. He closed up shop this week to prevent the possibility of OLCC action while he waits for that license. Assuming the application goes through, he will eventually reopen with some guidelines in place.
What was the OLCC's beef? A letter to Pottle dated Dec. 9 (and acquired by WW) outlines the agency's concerns in several areas. The most prominent issues involve production levels and fees.
The OLCC had discovered evidence that Pottle was brewing 30 gallons of beer every week...more than 1,500 gallons annually if extrapolated out. By the way, this fact was not revealed in Cizmar's story. It was evidently included in a TV interview Pottle did for the Esquire Network's Brew Dogs. The law limits unlicensed beer production at home to 100 gallons a year (200 in a house with two adults).
Donations, required or otherwise, were the other major issue. When I visited Dean's Scene more than a year ago, a sign on the wall said "No Beer Without Donation." Cizmar's story indicated that donations were optional. Wall signage shown in a photo published with the story contradicted that statement, but never mind. It doesn't matter to the OLCC if a donation is required or optional. You cannot charge or accept a fee for beer unless you have an OLCC license. Period. Some will quibble with this requirement, but it is clearly the law.
So Pottle was in clear violation of at least two OLCC regulations. It seems to me he should have acquired the appropriate OLCC license long ago, assuming he intended to brew 30 gallons of beer per week and offset the cost of that production via donations. By operating outside legal guidelines, he was inviting scrutiny. Why shouldn't he comply with the law? Other people do.
If the Willamette Week story and the Brew Dogs piece helped bring Pottle into compliance, perhaps that's not such a bad thing. Go ahead and turn Martin Cizmar into a virtual punching bag if you want, but what happened to Dean's Scene ain't his fault.
The story announcing the closure of Dean's funhouse first appeared on the Willamette Week website. There's a reason. Several months ago, WW ran a story that delved into the goings on at Dean's Scene. It was a decidedly positive story written by Martin Cizmar, arts and culture editor at WW.
At the time, many beer geeks thought the story a bad idea...thinking it drew attention to a well-kept secret that needed to stay that way. With the announcement that Dean has shut things down, those folks are piling the blame on Cizmar and WW. This is what declining attention spans do for us.
There are several points that need clarification and, apparently, explanation. Because there are details in this mess of a story that are being horrendously overlooked.
For the record, I have no loyalty to Cizmar or WW. We run in some of the same circles, but I've never met Cizmar. I exchanged emails with WW editor, Mark Zusman, Cizmar and others as part of last year's book project. That's it. In fact, I have criticized some of Cizmar's work at WW and it stuck in his craw. Even though I often disagree with his opinions, I think he's a good writer who produces entertaining stuff. But I have zero loyalty to him or WW.
Who's responsible for the closure of Dean's Scene? Definitely not Willamette Week. The original story was a great example of providing information of interest to the community. See, that's what journalists are supposed to do. Newspapers and news weeklies pay their bills by building readership that helps sell ads and subscriptions. Cizmar's story on Dean's Scene was a dialed-in fit for those objectives.
There's more. It was not Cizmar's job to investigate the legality of the operation at Dean's Scene. Or, more to the point, to evaluate the impact of the publicity. His job was to write a story that reported on what the place had to offer, good or bad. It certainly was not his job to keep Dean's Scene secret or write a negative story so the beer geek community could keep the place all to itself.
If you want to place blame, look no further than the owner of the establishment, Pottle. He agreed to be interviewed for the WW story. If he was remotely concerned that publicity might attract the interest and ire of the OLCC, he should have declined to be interviewed. Cizmar may have still written the story, but it would have been less detailed.
Another thing to consider is this: Dean's Scene is not closed permanently. In response to the OLCC notices, Pottle filed an application for a home brewers and private club license in mid-January. He closed up shop this week to prevent the possibility of OLCC action while he waits for that license. Assuming the application goes through, he will eventually reopen with some guidelines in place.
What was the OLCC's beef? A letter to Pottle dated Dec. 9 (and acquired by WW) outlines the agency's concerns in several areas. The most prominent issues involve production levels and fees.
The OLCC had discovered evidence that Pottle was brewing 30 gallons of beer every week...more than 1,500 gallons annually if extrapolated out. By the way, this fact was not revealed in Cizmar's story. It was evidently included in a TV interview Pottle did for the Esquire Network's Brew Dogs. The law limits unlicensed beer production at home to 100 gallons a year (200 in a house with two adults).
Donations, required or otherwise, were the other major issue. When I visited Dean's Scene more than a year ago, a sign on the wall said "No Beer Without Donation." Cizmar's story indicated that donations were optional. Wall signage shown in a photo published with the story contradicted that statement, but never mind. It doesn't matter to the OLCC if a donation is required or optional. You cannot charge or accept a fee for beer unless you have an OLCC license. Period. Some will quibble with this requirement, but it is clearly the law.
So Pottle was in clear violation of at least two OLCC regulations. It seems to me he should have acquired the appropriate OLCC license long ago, assuming he intended to brew 30 gallons of beer per week and offset the cost of that production via donations. By operating outside legal guidelines, he was inviting scrutiny. Why shouldn't he comply with the law? Other people do.
If the Willamette Week story and the Brew Dogs piece helped bring Pottle into compliance, perhaps that's not such a bad thing. Go ahead and turn Martin Cizmar into a virtual punching bag if you want, but what happened to Dean's Scene ain't his fault.
Friday, January 31, 2014
Fred Meyer Enters Portland Growler Sweepstakes
Fred Meyer this week launched growler filling stations in three of its busiest Portland stores: Burlingame, Hawthorne and Hollywood. I visited the Hollywood store Thursday evening and Friday, just as they opened the taps. This was a very soft opening. In fact, I'm Hollywood's first growler customer...a quart of Lucky Lab Super Dog IPA. Almost famous.
Freddy's is entering the growler game on a virtual tsunami. Let me explain. Places that fill growlers are popping up everywhere around town. And not just in town. A couple I met at Belmont Station told me about a store in Damascus that fills growlers. Damascus!
The reality is, we are awash in these things. Not so long ago, it was considered chic and forward-thinking to offer growler fills. Now the idea is almost passe. You wonder where this is headed, how many of these places the community will support. But never mind.
Hollywood Freddy's is an excellent target for the growler concept. The store is located on the fringe of the affluent Irvington neighborhood. They sell a boatload of wine here. Until the recent (2012) reset, this store was down in the dumps on the beer side. Not any more. They now have a great beer selection. And it sells.
What they have now is 16 taps of craft beer and cider. When I arrived Friday morning, they were offering 14 beers and two ciders. The gent manning the taps (who preferred that his name not be used) said they will eventually add kombucha and maybe a couple of wines. That mix would be similar to what I've observed at Whole Foods locations, though most of those stores have fewer taps.
Freddy's will fill clean 32 and 64 oz containers. Bring in a bottle that smells like a dead raccoon and they won't fill it. If you don't have your own container, they sell standard 64 oz growlers for $4.99, not a bad deal. They will likely be selling 32 oz grenades and stainless steel growlers at some point. Of course, this is Fred Meyer. They sell all kinds of containers, many of which would be perfect for beer.
Pricing is on the high side in my estimation. My 32 oz grenade of Super Dog was $5.99, cheapest in the house. The highest priced full growler (two beers at this price) was $15.99 and the lowest (again, two beers) was $9.99. Not exactly cheap. Prices will obviously fluctuate with the beers, which will rotate quickly since they have mostly 1/6 barrel kegs in the coolers. I get that. But the list will have to be more spectacular to capture my interest at those prices.
When you get your growler filled, the barkeep will attach sealant tape and a tag with a PLU#. Yes, this is similar to what you do when you put a number on a bag of bulk nuts or whatever. The tag also specifies whether the growler belongs to the customer or store. Now you take your growler (growlers, for the greedy) to checkout and it is handled just like bulk food. Pretty smooth.
If I were installing a growler fill station in a store like this, I would want to ensure that it didn't cannibalize existing sales. Fred Meyers gets it. The gent I spoke to said they will address that concern by featuring mostly one-off beers that aren't for sale in packaged form. One of my industry sources had already told me that's what they were doing, but I'm stubborn...and nosy.
As I mentioned near the top, and have mentioned in past posts on the proliferation of taprooms and growler fill stations, we simply do not know how many of these places the market will bear. Grocery stores entering the fray is a significant development. Competition is the reason.
Because grocery stores do so much more volume than your average taproom, bar or convenience store, distributors are going to want to keep them happy. Now we have a situation in which behemoth stores are competing with taprooms and smaller growler fill locations for special beers. This is going to get interesting.
![]() |
First growler filled at Hollywood store |
The reality is, we are awash in these things. Not so long ago, it was considered chic and forward-thinking to offer growler fills. Now the idea is almost passe. You wonder where this is headed, how many of these places the community will support. But never mind.
Hollywood Freddy's is an excellent target for the growler concept. The store is located on the fringe of the affluent Irvington neighborhood. They sell a boatload of wine here. Until the recent (2012) reset, this store was down in the dumps on the beer side. Not any more. They now have a great beer selection. And it sells.
What they have now is 16 taps of craft beer and cider. When I arrived Friday morning, they were offering 14 beers and two ciders. The gent manning the taps (who preferred that his name not be used) said they will eventually add kombucha and maybe a couple of wines. That mix would be similar to what I've observed at Whole Foods locations, though most of those stores have fewer taps.
Freddy's will fill clean 32 and 64 oz containers. Bring in a bottle that smells like a dead raccoon and they won't fill it. If you don't have your own container, they sell standard 64 oz growlers for $4.99, not a bad deal. They will likely be selling 32 oz grenades and stainless steel growlers at some point. Of course, this is Fred Meyer. They sell all kinds of containers, many of which would be perfect for beer.
Pricing is on the high side in my estimation. My 32 oz grenade of Super Dog was $5.99, cheapest in the house. The highest priced full growler (two beers at this price) was $15.99 and the lowest (again, two beers) was $9.99. Not exactly cheap. Prices will obviously fluctuate with the beers, which will rotate quickly since they have mostly 1/6 barrel kegs in the coolers. I get that. But the list will have to be more spectacular to capture my interest at those prices.
When you get your growler filled, the barkeep will attach sealant tape and a tag with a PLU#. Yes, this is similar to what you do when you put a number on a bag of bulk nuts or whatever. The tag also specifies whether the growler belongs to the customer or store. Now you take your growler (growlers, for the greedy) to checkout and it is handled just like bulk food. Pretty smooth.
If I were installing a growler fill station in a store like this, I would want to ensure that it didn't cannibalize existing sales. Fred Meyers gets it. The gent I spoke to said they will address that concern by featuring mostly one-off beers that aren't for sale in packaged form. One of my industry sources had already told me that's what they were doing, but I'm stubborn...and nosy.
As I mentioned near the top, and have mentioned in past posts on the proliferation of taprooms and growler fill stations, we simply do not know how many of these places the market will bear. Grocery stores entering the fray is a significant development. Competition is the reason.
Because grocery stores do so much more volume than your average taproom, bar or convenience store, distributors are going to want to keep them happy. Now we have a situation in which behemoth stores are competing with taprooms and smaller growler fill locations for special beers. This is going to get interesting.
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
Larrance and Foyston: Champions of Portland Beer
Last night's festivities at the Cascade Barrel House honored Art Larrance for his contributions to Portland's beer scene. There was a good crowd on hand. An oil painting of Art by John Foyston was unveiled. Larrance and Foyston have both contributed plenty to the beer culture here. Champions they are. More on why shortly.
A bunch of Art's Oregon Brewers Festival partners came up with the painting idea as a way of honoring him. These folks are mostly unknown outside the beer community. People like Teddy Peetz, Preston Weesner and Chris Crabb, all integral parts of the OBF virtually forever. They're mostly in the background and they like it that way.
These good folks commissioned Foyston to produce the painting that was unveiled last night much to Art's surprise. See, he was kept totally in the dark...very hush-hush. When I casually mentioned the upcoming event to Weesner at Belmont Station the other night, he gave me the universal "sheesh" symbol. I suspect the NSA knew, but almost no one else.
The painting is a great likeness of Art. Foyston has had some practice. He has several pictures hanging in pubs around town. Have you seen Don Younger above the fireplace at Lompoc's Sidebar? How about Younger at the Horse Brass? Or the rustic landscape at The Commons? Those are all John's paintings. And there are reportedly more on the way.
What about this Larrance character, anyway? Why should he be honored? Silly rabbit. Art belongs in the same breath as Henry Weinhard, Arnold Blitz and the Wessingers on the list of Portland beer royalty. Read my history of Portland beer if you want to know more. Art's contributions via Portland Brewing, the Oregon Brewers Festival, Raccoon Lodge and Cascade Barrel House are impossible to overlook. He's had a hand in exposing millions to great beer.
"We were lucky," Larrance said, grouping himself with Fred Bowman and Jim Goodwin, co-founders of Portland Brewing in 1986. "We came around at just the right time and took advantage of a terrific opportunity. I've been fortunate to ride that wave with Cascade Brewing and the OBF. If it hadn't been me, I honestly think it would have been someone else."
Where does Foyston fit in? Again, silly question, silly rabbit. John is a talented writer, far better than most of us who attempt to cover the beer scene. He has been writing about beer for the Oregonian for nearly 20 years. His columns provide a base of knowledge and perspective, not to mention an event calendar. The painting gig is a recent venture and merely demonstrates John's renaissance man talents.
"I'm really happy to be involved in recognizing the people who were instrumental in getting craft beer off the ground in Portland," Foyston said. "Art's contributions are hard to fathom because they have benefitted the entire community."
As far as I'm concerned, we need more of these paintings. Need a list? For starters, Kurt and Rob Widmer, Mike and Brian McMenamin, Dick and Nancy Ponzi and Fred Eckhardt. Add Charles Coury, founder of the ill-fated Cartwright Brewing, to the list. Getting these folks in oil would be a nice start...and there will be others. It would be really great if this work got us talking about the beer museum we desperately need in Portland. But never mind. I digress.
Anyway, congratulations to Art Larrance on being recognized for his contributions to Portland beer. Certainly well-deserved. Similar congrats and thanks to John Foyston for his efforts. Word is the portrait will find a home at the Raccoon Lodge. Sounds about right.
![]() |
Foyston with his painting...and Larrance |
These good folks commissioned Foyston to produce the painting that was unveiled last night much to Art's surprise. See, he was kept totally in the dark...very hush-hush. When I casually mentioned the upcoming event to Weesner at Belmont Station the other night, he gave me the universal "sheesh" symbol. I suspect the NSA knew, but almost no one else.
The painting is a great likeness of Art. Foyston has had some practice. He has several pictures hanging in pubs around town. Have you seen Don Younger above the fireplace at Lompoc's Sidebar? How about Younger at the Horse Brass? Or the rustic landscape at The Commons? Those are all John's paintings. And there are reportedly more on the way.
What about this Larrance character, anyway? Why should he be honored? Silly rabbit. Art belongs in the same breath as Henry Weinhard, Arnold Blitz and the Wessingers on the list of Portland beer royalty. Read my history of Portland beer if you want to know more. Art's contributions via Portland Brewing, the Oregon Brewers Festival, Raccoon Lodge and Cascade Barrel House are impossible to overlook. He's had a hand in exposing millions to great beer.
![]() |
Art with longtime buddy, Teddy Peetz |
Where does Foyston fit in? Again, silly question, silly rabbit. John is a talented writer, far better than most of us who attempt to cover the beer scene. He has been writing about beer for the Oregonian for nearly 20 years. His columns provide a base of knowledge and perspective, not to mention an event calendar. The painting gig is a recent venture and merely demonstrates John's renaissance man talents.
"I'm really happy to be involved in recognizing the people who were instrumental in getting craft beer off the ground in Portland," Foyston said. "Art's contributions are hard to fathom because they have benefitted the entire community."
As far as I'm concerned, we need more of these paintings. Need a list? For starters, Kurt and Rob Widmer, Mike and Brian McMenamin, Dick and Nancy Ponzi and Fred Eckhardt. Add Charles Coury, founder of the ill-fated Cartwright Brewing, to the list. Getting these folks in oil would be a nice start...and there will be others. It would be really great if this work got us talking about the beer museum we desperately need in Portland. But never mind. I digress.
Anyway, congratulations to Art Larrance on being recognized for his contributions to Portland beer. Certainly well-deserved. Similar congrats and thanks to John Foyston for his efforts. Word is the portrait will find a home at the Raccoon Lodge. Sounds about right.
Thursday, January 23, 2014
Morgan Dumps Craft Chumps in Wake of Buyout
Sometimes the beer business is creative comedy. Sometimes tragedy. Sometimes it's a mix of both. You just never know what crazy and insane chain of events is coming down the pike. I suppose that's one of the things that keeps it interesting.
When I reported on Anheuser-Busch's buyout of Morgan Distributing a couple of weeks back, I did not know what the fallout would be. It's probably fair to say no one knew. We suspected the buyout would lead to Morgan being more active as a pusher of AB products. We didn't know the rest.
Thanks to reliable industry sources, we now know. There's no sugarcoating it. Within days of AB taking over, Morgan terminated its craft brands. Yep. Fired them. They later rescinded the termination letter and told craft brands they were up for "assignment"...a nice way of saying for sale to other distributors.
There are a couple of things to keep in mind.
First, Morgan was not exactly a bastion of craft beer. Its short list of craft brands included Three Creeks, Silver Moon, Gilgamesh and Uinta. The Commons was a recent, hot addition, which I'll get to. I'm leaving out the CBA (Widmer, Kona, Redhook, etc.) brands, which Morgan already pushes heavily, because the CBA is distributed by AB and wasn't going anywhere.
Second, Morgan likely would have lost its craft brands in the wake of the buyout due to the way Oregon law works. When distributor ownership changes, contracted brands have the option of renegotiating new deals with anyone they want. Firing them just made that point official with an exclamation point..
All of Morgan's former craft brands are looking for and will soon have new homes. The Commons will go back to self-distribution, which is what they've done from the outset. It's almost comical to consider that Morgan worked diligently to sign these guys then dumped them days into the relationship. That's pretty funny in a sick sort of way.
The more significant point to consider is this: The new bosses at Morgan had ZERO intention of retaining their craft brands. They wanted them gone, the sooner the better. I'm told Morgan has so much going on with its AB portfolio that it has no room for craft brands. They have given other distributors the green light to go after their former brands and expect no compensation at all.
What are they up to? AB-owned Morgan will clearly become a bastion of AB brands. As I said in the earlier post and as Ezra outlines in his post on how the three-tier system works, self-distribution laws in Oregon allowed this takeover to happen. Anheuser-Busch will essentially be distributing its own beer via Morgan. Perfectly legal. They are also reportedly looking to purchase Maletis, which has a far more significant craft presence than Morgan ever had. This is how AB intends to address declining market share in Oregon.
The danger of this arrangement is clear. Buying up distributors is part of an effort to push craft brands into a corner while stuffing AB products down the throats of consumers. These guys are anti-craft beer. Period. Distributors have extensive control over what appears on store shelves, in taverns and other retail settings. You can bet AB intends to use that leverage to the fullest extent possible. If you haven't heard of Shock Top or Bud Light Platinum, you will.
In my mind, what's going on should be illegal. Oregon's self-distribution law was intended to help small brands. Many small breweries need the dollars that would otherwise go to a distributor when they're getting started. No one apparently considered the possibility that gigantic companies would use the self distribution law to buy up distributors and bully the market. Ye gods!
This is not good news if you're a fan of good beer. Trust me.
![]() |
Sure thing |
When I reported on Anheuser-Busch's buyout of Morgan Distributing a couple of weeks back, I did not know what the fallout would be. It's probably fair to say no one knew. We suspected the buyout would lead to Morgan being more active as a pusher of AB products. We didn't know the rest.
Thanks to reliable industry sources, we now know. There's no sugarcoating it. Within days of AB taking over, Morgan terminated its craft brands. Yep. Fired them. They later rescinded the termination letter and told craft brands they were up for "assignment"...a nice way of saying for sale to other distributors.
There are a couple of things to keep in mind.
First, Morgan was not exactly a bastion of craft beer. Its short list of craft brands included Three Creeks, Silver Moon, Gilgamesh and Uinta. The Commons was a recent, hot addition, which I'll get to. I'm leaving out the CBA (Widmer, Kona, Redhook, etc.) brands, which Morgan already pushes heavily, because the CBA is distributed by AB and wasn't going anywhere.
Second, Morgan likely would have lost its craft brands in the wake of the buyout due to the way Oregon law works. When distributor ownership changes, contracted brands have the option of renegotiating new deals with anyone they want. Firing them just made that point official with an exclamation point..
All of Morgan's former craft brands are looking for and will soon have new homes. The Commons will go back to self-distribution, which is what they've done from the outset. It's almost comical to consider that Morgan worked diligently to sign these guys then dumped them days into the relationship. That's pretty funny in a sick sort of way.
The more significant point to consider is this: The new bosses at Morgan had ZERO intention of retaining their craft brands. They wanted them gone, the sooner the better. I'm told Morgan has so much going on with its AB portfolio that it has no room for craft brands. They have given other distributors the green light to go after their former brands and expect no compensation at all.
What are they up to? AB-owned Morgan will clearly become a bastion of AB brands. As I said in the earlier post and as Ezra outlines in his post on how the three-tier system works, self-distribution laws in Oregon allowed this takeover to happen. Anheuser-Busch will essentially be distributing its own beer via Morgan. Perfectly legal. They are also reportedly looking to purchase Maletis, which has a far more significant craft presence than Morgan ever had. This is how AB intends to address declining market share in Oregon.
The danger of this arrangement is clear. Buying up distributors is part of an effort to push craft brands into a corner while stuffing AB products down the throats of consumers. These guys are anti-craft beer. Period. Distributors have extensive control over what appears on store shelves, in taverns and other retail settings. You can bet AB intends to use that leverage to the fullest extent possible. If you haven't heard of Shock Top or Bud Light Platinum, you will.
In my mind, what's going on should be illegal. Oregon's self-distribution law was intended to help small brands. Many small breweries need the dollars that would otherwise go to a distributor when they're getting started. No one apparently considered the possibility that gigantic companies would use the self distribution law to buy up distributors and bully the market. Ye gods!
This is not good news if you're a fan of good beer. Trust me.
Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Rise of Taprooms, Growler Fill Locations Continues
Possibly the most significant emerging truism with respect to Portland's beer scene is you don't have to make good beer to serve or sell good beer. This is a result of the fact that we have a growing number of taprooms, growler fill locations and pubs that offer lots of great beer to stay or go.
This likely would not be happening if breweries and brewpubs hadn't paved the way. The folks who pioneered great beer in this city built the foundation upon which the current craft beer craze rests. The obvious suspects in this regard are Widmer, Bridgeport, Portland Brewing and McMenamins. But an inclusive list would also recognize breweries that opened more recently.
I just received word that a new growler fill station will open on Southeast Hawthorne in a couple of weeks. It's to be called Growlers Hawthorne and will be located at 3343 SE Hawthorne. Official opening is set for noon, Feb. 4. Their "under construction" website is here.
Growlers Hawthorne will have 40 rotating taps (beer, cider, mead), plus eight more taps pouring non-alcoholic drinks like kombucha. They have a weeklong grand opening planned, with exclusive beers and Meet the Brewer events featuring folks from 10 Barrel, Oakshire and Firestone Walker. It's going to be fun, no doubt.
Something to keep in mind about Growlers Hawthorne is there will be no on-premise consumption, outside sampling. This is essentially a growler fill station similar to what you find in some grocery stores, mini-marts, etc. You get your container filled and you vamoose. That's in contrast to what we see with taprooms, where you can buy beer to consume there or take with you.
Today's press release doesn't say it, but there's another place going in on Southeast Hawthorne and it will be a taproom similar to places like Tin Bucket (North Williams) and the Imperial Bottleshop and Taproom (Southeast Division). I don't yet know what it will be called or when it will open, But I know it's coming. Somewhere around 20th and SE Hawthorne, if you're wondering.
It's not so hard to see what's driving people to open these places: Demand for great beer continues to grow. If you want to tap (haha) into that growth curve, opening a taproom/bottleshop or growler fill station is a relatively easy way to do it. Certainly far cheaper than a pub, brewpub or brewery. And easier to borrow money because startup costs and risks are lower.
The elephant in the living room is this: How many of these places can the market bear? As usual, no one has an answer. While fizzy beer fizzles, we continue to see growth in craft beer numbers nationally, regionally and locally. The indicators are up. More shelf space in grocery and convenience stores appears to be occupied by craft brands.
My opinion, for what it's worth, is this: There are plenty of areas in this city that remain woefully underserved in terms of taprooms or growler fill stations offering a range of quality beers beyond what you might find in a nearby brewpub. I count my own neighborhood (Rose City Park) as being on that list. I suspect we will soon have a growler fill station or taproom of some sort nearby.
The Hawthorne corridor already features a number of places where you can get good beer. Beermongers and Apex aren't far. Blitz Ladd fills growlers and isn't far. But there's a hefty amount of pedestrian, bike and commuter traffic through there. And there's a large and growing residential community. My bet is these new places will be supported. Time will tell.
Nonetheless, we will eventually reach the saturation point. That will happen when we have multiple retail locations (stores, taprooms, pubs) in an area offering growlers fills and specialty bottles. At that point, they will cannabalize each other's customers. We aren't there yet and it may be a while for most parts of the city.
This likely would not be happening if breweries and brewpubs hadn't paved the way. The folks who pioneered great beer in this city built the foundation upon which the current craft beer craze rests. The obvious suspects in this regard are Widmer, Bridgeport, Portland Brewing and McMenamins. But an inclusive list would also recognize breweries that opened more recently.
I just received word that a new growler fill station will open on Southeast Hawthorne in a couple of weeks. It's to be called Growlers Hawthorne and will be located at 3343 SE Hawthorne. Official opening is set for noon, Feb. 4. Their "under construction" website is here.
Growlers Hawthorne will have 40 rotating taps (beer, cider, mead), plus eight more taps pouring non-alcoholic drinks like kombucha. They have a weeklong grand opening planned, with exclusive beers and Meet the Brewer events featuring folks from 10 Barrel, Oakshire and Firestone Walker. It's going to be fun, no doubt.
Something to keep in mind about Growlers Hawthorne is there will be no on-premise consumption, outside sampling. This is essentially a growler fill station similar to what you find in some grocery stores, mini-marts, etc. You get your container filled and you vamoose. That's in contrast to what we see with taprooms, where you can buy beer to consume there or take with you.
Today's press release doesn't say it, but there's another place going in on Southeast Hawthorne and it will be a taproom similar to places like Tin Bucket (North Williams) and the Imperial Bottleshop and Taproom (Southeast Division). I don't yet know what it will be called or when it will open, But I know it's coming. Somewhere around 20th and SE Hawthorne, if you're wondering.
It's not so hard to see what's driving people to open these places: Demand for great beer continues to grow. If you want to tap (haha) into that growth curve, opening a taproom/bottleshop or growler fill station is a relatively easy way to do it. Certainly far cheaper than a pub, brewpub or brewery. And easier to borrow money because startup costs and risks are lower.
The elephant in the living room is this: How many of these places can the market bear? As usual, no one has an answer. While fizzy beer fizzles, we continue to see growth in craft beer numbers nationally, regionally and locally. The indicators are up. More shelf space in grocery and convenience stores appears to be occupied by craft brands.
My opinion, for what it's worth, is this: There are plenty of areas in this city that remain woefully underserved in terms of taprooms or growler fill stations offering a range of quality beers beyond what you might find in a nearby brewpub. I count my own neighborhood (Rose City Park) as being on that list. I suspect we will soon have a growler fill station or taproom of some sort nearby.
The Hawthorne corridor already features a number of places where you can get good beer. Beermongers and Apex aren't far. Blitz Ladd fills growlers and isn't far. But there's a hefty amount of pedestrian, bike and commuter traffic through there. And there's a large and growing residential community. My bet is these new places will be supported. Time will tell.
Nonetheless, we will eventually reach the saturation point. That will happen when we have multiple retail locations (stores, taprooms, pubs) in an area offering growlers fills and specialty bottles. At that point, they will cannabalize each other's customers. We aren't there yet and it may be a while for most parts of the city.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)